Lisa B. Williams v. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, and Office of Special Counsel Governor's Office for Individuals With Disabilities
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed and remanded by published PER CURIAM opinion.
OPINION
2Per curiam
The United States Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or the Board) appeals the district court’s finding that Lisa B. Williams, a state employee, was not subject to the Hatch Political Activity Act (Hatch Act), 5 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1508 (1988). Because we find that Williams was a “covered employee” subject to the proscriptions of the Act, we reverse the district court’s narrow interpretation of the Act and remand for further proceedings.
I
Between 1987 and 1994, Williams worked as Executive Assistant to the Director of the Governor’s…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Lisa B. Williams v. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, and Office of Special Counsel Governor's Office for Individuals With DisabilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- State of Minnesota, Department of Jobs and Training v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Robert D. Alexander v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Rupert v. GerenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Crespo v. United States Merit Systems Protection BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Burke v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- (2000), Maryland Attorney General Reports2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.