Legal Opinion
Mandelstam v. City of South Miami
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 23, 1996No. 95-2753PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
685 So.2d 868 (1996)
Rod and Carol MANDELSTAM, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 95-2753.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
October 23, 1996.
Rehearing Denied January 15, 1997.
Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, and Stanley B. Price and Eileen Ball Mehta, Miami, for appellants.
Earl G. Gallop, Miami; Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke & George, and Richard H. McDuff, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and COPE, JJ.
NESBITT, Judge.
Rod and Carol Mandelstam purchased a parcel of real property with RS-3 zoning, on Red Road near Dante…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Espanola Way Corp. v. Murray MeyersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Boatman v. Town of Oakland, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Jacobi v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lester v. Town of WinthropCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- COMMISSIONER JOE CAROLLO v. PLATINUM ADVISORS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021