Legal Opinion

Little v. Heimlich

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 15, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowdrey, P.J.

This is a petition to establish the plaintiff’s draft report which was dismissed1 by the trial court as not in compliance with Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 64.

Despite the clear and unequivocal terminology of Rule 64(c) (6) and a seemingly endless progression of decisive opinions from this Division and the Supreme Judicial Court, we are once again compelled to reiterate a rule which should be by now axiomatic. The proper and exclusive remedy for the dismissal of a draft report is a request for a report and a draft report challenging, and limited to, said dismissal order. Dist./Mun. Cts. R.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. AtkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Comfort Air Systems, Inc. v. CacopardoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Calcagno v. P. H. Graham & Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Parkway Imports, Inc. v. AskinosMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Lane v. SmithMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. HautalaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  2. Onessimo v. CarvelliMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. DanielMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Randazzo v. O'BrienMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Mason v. PerlmanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API