Legal Opinion

Noland v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1971No. 45,930PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries received when she fell down some steps leading from the Sears, Roebuck department store in Wichita. The trial court sustained the defendant’s motion for dismissal made at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, and she has appealed.

The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, the status they occupied in the court below.

Mrs. Noland, the injured plaintiff, had purchased a power saw on a layaway plan as a Christmas gift for her husband. On December 8, 1967, accompanied…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Little v. ButnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Furstenberg v. Wesley Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Springfield Tent & Awning Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Randall v. NasbargColorado Court of Appeals · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Leliefeld v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API