Legal Opinion

J.A. v. Smith Cnty. Sch. Dist.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided March 6, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00043PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

*807Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. No. 38), Smith County School District's ("Smith County") objections to the R & R (Doc. No. 43), and Plaintiffs' response in support of the R & R (Doc. No. 44). For the reasons stated below, Smith County's objections to the R & R will be overruled, and the Magistrate Judge's R & R will be approved and adopted.

I. Factual Background 1

This is an action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), 20 U.S.C. § 1400, et seq. ,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Alexander v. University of MemphisDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
  2. Alvin Rice v. Jessica Kalmewicki, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  3. Ayers v. City of Memphis, TennesseeDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024
  4. Broady (Davis) v. Memphis Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023
  5. Clark v. ClawsonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API