Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Patton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1929No. 9336. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The appellee was injured on November 2, 1926, while in the course of his employment by Horton & Horton, for whom appellant was the insurer under the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Law; he duly presented his claim for compensation to the State Industrial Accident Board, which on March 28, 1928, made its final ruling and decision thereon, awarding him a recovery against appellant for $20 per week for 401 weeks, less payments the insurer had already made.

Appellant, within 20 days after the entry of such final ruling, that is, on April 16, 1928, filed with the Industrial Accident Board — pursuant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Odum v. GarnerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Farmers' Life Ins. Co. v. WoltersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Glenn v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Industrial Commission v. AgeeUtah Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Texas Employers Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Patton v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Petroleum Casualty Company v. CanalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Brooks v. Texas Employers Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API