Legal Opinion
In Re Joe Brown & Sons
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1935No. Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 38,368PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.
Petitioner, then operating as a “limited common carrier,” requested “an extension of service in the transportation of: iron and iron products between Muskegon, Grand Rapids and Detroit and various points intra- and interstate.” Following a hearing on June 14,1934, at which time those opposing the petition were represented, the commission, by its order dated June 25th granted an extension of service “limited to the transportation interstate and intrastate of: iron and iron products between Muskegon, Grand Rapids and Detroit anj various points.”
The next day it requested that the permit be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Taylor v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Burr v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
3Cited by10 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Turner v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hubbard v. Board of Trustees of Dearborn Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- G & a Truck Line, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Furniture Capital Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.