Legal Opinion

Meader v. IRA Resources, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 27, 2005No. 14-04-00552-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s order granting a special appearance motion filed by IRA Resources, Inc., California Bank & Trust as Successor in Interest to Eldorado Bank and Eldorado Bank (“Eldorado”) (collectively, “appellees”). In one issue, appellant James I. Meader challenges the trial court’s order, claiming ap-pellees have sufficient minimum contacts with Texas to support an assertion of personal jurisdiction. We conclude that the record evidence does not establish the requisite minimum contacts with this forum, and therefore affirm the trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. IRA Resources, Inc. v. GriegoTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Capital Finance & Commerce AG v. Sinopec Overseas Oil & Gas, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  3. Ken Hoagland v. Bill Butcher, Kari Butcher, Butcher & Butcher, and OCTV Partners, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  4. Denso Corporation v. Mahmoud A. Dweib, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  5. Megadrill Services Limited MD Nigeria L.L.C. Depthwize Nigeria Limited And Robert P. Dunn v. Tom Brighouse, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API