Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Mississippi State Highway Comm.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1954No. 39158PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGehee, C. J.

An interlocutory appeal was allowed by the trial court in the above styled cause from an order sustaining a general demurrer to the amended bill of com plaint filed by tbe appellants. The order granting the appeal provides that it is without supersedeas and is granted to settle all of the controlling principles involved in the cause.

The appellants, William M. Hamilton and others, jointly own certain property in the southern part of the City of Meridian which abuts on the west side of Hamilton Road, which runs generally in a northern and southern direction. This public thoroughfare is paved,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tomazewski v. Palmer Bee Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Town of Clinton v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Puyper v. Pure Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Poythress v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  5. City of Ellisville v. State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Muse v. Mississippi State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. SpencerMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hamilton v. Mississippi State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Mississippi State Highway Commission v. JacobsMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  5. St. Andrew's Episcopal Day School v. MTCMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API