Legal Opinion

Teague v. Regional Commissioner of Customs

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 14, 1968No. Nos. 1, 2, Dockets 31966, 32077PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Circuit Judge:. ,, „ Appellants are the addressees of mail ?ackages containing publications orig- ? ma3^á TCThiaa' jfben Atbese Plages reach the United States tbey are detalned by the Commissioner of Customs pursuant to the Foreign Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 500.808 (1968).1 The Commissioner sends letters of notice to the addressees advising them of the detention and stating that the material will be released only if Foreign Assets Control issues a license.

Appellants did not apply for licenses for the packages addressed to them,2 but brought this action, asserting that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Collins v. Union Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Veterans and Reservists for Peace in Vietnam v. Regional Commissioner of Customs, Region II and Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. v. BradyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Cheng Yih-Chun v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Cernuda v. HeaveyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API