Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Magruder

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1949No. 5870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether the plaintiff taxpayer, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, is entitled to a refund of $190,396.27 in corporate income and excess profits taxes for the year 1936. It paid this sum when the Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed a deduction of $2,525,543.91 that the taxpayer had accrued on its books for that year as excise taxes under Section 4 of the Carriers’ Taxing Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 974, 45 U.S. C.A. §§ 241 to 253. The District Court granted a motion for summary judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Dixie Pine Products Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  4. Alton R. Co. v. Railroad Retirement BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1936
  5. Davies' Estate v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. FoxDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1958
  2. Capital One Financial Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  3. Capital One Financial Corporation v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  4. Downs Racing, L.P. v. Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API