Alton R. Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY, Justice.
On August 29, 1935, the President approved two acts of Congress, one “To establish a retirement system for employees of carriers subject to the Interstate Commerce Act, and for other purposes” (49 Stat. 967 [45 U.S.C.A. § 215 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.A. § 410a]), and the other “To levy an excise tax upon carriers and an income tax upon their employees” (49 Stat. 974 [45 U.S.C.A. § 241 et seq.]). The latter act provides that there shall be levied upon the income of every employee of these carriers 3y2 per centum of the compensation of such employee, not in excess of $300 per month,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hepburn v. GriswoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Great American Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Mcmullans v. Kansas, Oklahoma And Gulf Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Missouri Pacific Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.