Legal Opinion

Vann v. Vernon General Insurance

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1956No. 18,678Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Kelley, J.

Appellee, plying its rehearing petition with intense earnestness and persuasive logic, urges that the policy of insurance involved in this action contained a requirement that “written” notice of accident and “sworn” proof of loss be filed by the insured with the appellee before action could be maintained on such policy, and that “there was utterly no evidence of any attempt to comply with that requirement”.

Such contention, presently urged, found no place in appellee’s brief and no utterance thereof was heard in the argument. However, if such point was made…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ætna Insurance v. ShryerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Providence Washington Insurance v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Ringo v. Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Funk v. RentchlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Vann v. Vernon General InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API