Legal Opinion
Pena v. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 2015No. 12-72099PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Opinion by
Judge RAWLINSON.
ORDER
Page 9 of the Slip Opinion filed September 28, 2015, first full paragraph is amended as follows:
1. Line 3 — insert <colorable> preceding < claim of>.
2. Line 12 — insert the following sentence following the citation to Flores-Miramontes v. I.N.S., 212 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir.2000): <But here, Pena does not raise a colorable constitutional claim, since the Immigration Judge elicited a voluntary waiver of counsel. >.
*4543. Lines 12-16 — replace the last sentence with the following language: <In addition, the jurisdiction-stripping provisions of the statute…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Andres Flores-Miramontes,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Garcia De Rincon v. Department of Homeland SEC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Coronado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Victor Raya-VacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam v. UsdhsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Israel Alvarado-Herrera v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Thuraissigiam v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- F.L.B. v. LynchDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
- Anthony Guerrier v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.