Legal Opinion

Goler Metropolitan Apartments, Inc. v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1979No. 7821DC1001PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

The first question on appeal is whether, in light of recent decisions tending to expand a tenant’s right of occupancy in public housing, tenancy in a federally subsidized low-income housing project can exist on a month-to-month basis. We hold that such a tenancy is consistent with the federal scheme of providing low-cost housing to qualified persons.

It has been recently established that a tenant in a federally subsidized low-income housing project enjoys substantial procedural due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. E.g., Caramico v. Secretary of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Escalera v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Caulder v. Durham Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  5. Thelma Joy, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Holland Daniels, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. MossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Carroll v. Housing Opportunities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Marina Food Associates, Inc. v. Marina Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Charlotte Housing Authority v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API