Legal Opinion

Bolden v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 2001No. A01A0527PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

We granted Gordie Bolden’s application for discretionary appeal to consider whether the trial court properly considered her plea of nolo contendere to a subsequent offense when it vacated her first offender status and resentenced her. Because we find that a nolo con*826tendere plea may be considered for the limited purpose of resentencing a defendant under the first offender provisions of OCGA § 42-8-60, we affirm.

After entering a guilty plea to one count of possession of marijuana and one count of sale of cocaine, Bolden was sentenced as a first offender. While on probation, Bolden…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Bolden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API