Legal Opinion

Bolden v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 13, 2002No. S01G1721PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

We granted Cordie Bolden’s petition for certiorari to address whether the Court of Appeals correctly ruled that the State could use Bolden’s plea of nolo contendere to establish a violation of her probation. See Bolden v. State, 250 Ga. App. 825 (552 SE2d 533) (2001). We hold that under the plain and unambiguous language of OCGA § 17- 7-95 (c) a nolo contendere plea cannot be used to establish a probation violation. Accordingly, we reverse.

Decided May 13, 2002. Gerard B. Kleinrock, for appellant. J. Tom Morgan, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Assistant District…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bolden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Spinner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Bolden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Hamidullah Nasir v. Gwinnett County State CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  5. Nasir v. Gwinnett County State CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API