Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Jemison

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1967No. 8388Published

1ConcurrenceTroop, J.

I concur in the judgment for the reasons set forth herein.

The entry, filed July 16, 1965, committing the defendant in the trial court to Lima State Hospital contains two significant phrases, as follows: (1) “it was suggested to the court that the defendant is not now sane,” and (2) “pursuant to the provisions of Section 2945.37 of the Revised Code of Ohio.”

Section 2945.37, Revised Code, does not authorize the sending of an accused to Lima. Only Section 2945.40, Revised Code, contains such authorization when insanity is set up as a defense. Whether by design or mistake, the order of the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FrohnerOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Evans v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Krauter v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Henry v. Alvis, WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API