Legal Opinion

United States v. Hogansburg Milk Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided August 18, 1944No. Civil Action No. 1534PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment against defendant Hogansburg Milk Company, Inc., and for dismissal of its counterclaims. The action was brought against this defendant alone. Upon its motion Aiello Dairy Farms, Inc., Louis Aiello and Alfonso. Aiello, doing business as Aiello Brothers, were made third party defendants. The third party defendants are not interested in the motion.

Defendant, Hogansburg Milk Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Hogans-burg,” was and is a handler of milk as defined in the New York Metropolitan Area Order, known, and herein…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradley v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. La Verne Co-Op. Citrus Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Hinman Farms Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1957
  2. United States v. WoodDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1945
  3. Gudgel v. IversonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1949
  4. United States v. KellyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API