Legal Opinion

United States v. Wood

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 1, 1945No. 210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, District Judge.

This case involves two motions. The first has been filed by the defendant for leave to amend its answer; the second by the United States for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Findings of fact are based on the pleadings and supporting affidavits.

Findings of Fact

This action was originally brought in March, 1939, to compel the defendant, Weiler-Sterling Farms Company (hereinafter referred to as the defendant), and others to comply with the terms of Order No. 4, a milk marketing order for the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank H. Conner Co. v. Spanish Inns Charlotte, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Johnson v. Citizens Casualty Company of New YorkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gudgel v. IversonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1949
  4. United States v. KellyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1946
  5. Willow Crossing Dairy Farm, Inc. v. HardinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API