Legal Opinion
Hark'n Technologies v. Orange Whip Fitness X
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 26, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00054Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION HARK’N TECHNOLOGIES, INC., M E M O R A N D U M DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS RE: Plaintiff, [328, 329] DISGORGEMENT, [306] PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, AND v. [307] PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORANGE WHIP FITNESS X, LLC, C a s e N o . 1 : 2 1 - c v - 0 0 0 54-CMR Defendant. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero Following a weeklong trial, a jury reached a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Hark’n Technologies Inc. (Hark’n) on its claims for trade dress infringement, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment (ECF 300). After the jury…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schrier v. University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Century 21 Real Estate Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Billy Sandlin, an Individual, Dba Century Investments & Realty, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.