Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 17, 1973No. CR 73-63PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

To reverse his conviction for first degree murder allegedly committed in the perpetration of a robbery, appellant Earnest Dean Murphy contends:

“I. The trial court erred in permitting the State to introduce that portion of the defendant’s statement which implicated him as a participant in another crime.

II. The trial court erred in permitting the sons of the deceased to testify, and in failing to strike their testimony and admonish the jury to disregard it.

III. The trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict for the defendant.-

IV. There is no substantial evidence to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LiebowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. PayneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API