Legal Opinion

State v. Sampson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 31, 1980No. 79-347PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

Following a hearing on defendant’s motions to quash and dismiss certain indictments, the Superior Court (Batchelder, J.) referred the questions raised by defendant’s motions to this court by interlocutory transfer, without ruling, pursuant to RSA 491:17 and Rule 9 of the Supreme Court Rules. The principal issues before this court are whether a newly-amended criminal statute applies only to offenses committed after its enactment and whether the indictments allege a sufficient “scheme or course of conduct” to allow aggregation of value under RSA 637:2 V(a) for purposes of establishing a basis…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BreestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  2. State v. InselburgSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. State v. BussiereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. EnglandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  5. State v. BanksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ChaissonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. State v. DesimoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. State v. HermsdorfSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. State v. BabbittSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API