Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Ragland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graef, C. J.

Plaintiff, T. J. Shoemaker, as administrator of the estate of J. H. Augustine, commenced this action to foreclose two real estate mortgages executed by the defendants, N. A. and Gertrude Ragland, husband and wife, to J. D. Plumb, and assigned to Augustine. The chronology of the case material to the propositions involved on this appeal is as follows:

On the 22d day of March, 1917, the defendant N. A. Rag-land became seized in fee simple, by deed of bargain and sale, executed by one Grover C. Duncan, of a certain parcel of real estate described as Lot 166 in Melrose Park, an addition to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farmer v. Bank of GraettingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Harrison v. LegoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Robertson v. U. S. Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Parmenter v. OakleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Bigelow v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Plymouth County, Iowa v. Merscorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Ulen v. KnecttleWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Kann v. FishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Whitney v. EichnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Wood v. SwanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API