Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. Craig

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1940No. 8,114Published

1DissentJustice Angstman

On motion for rehearing further consideration of this case impels me to the conclusion that the district court was correct and that the judgment should be affirmed. The court found that if Wegner should not pay the $2,800 on or before the first day of March, 1939, “he would forfeit the amount paid for failure to carry out. the terms of said offer, but that he would not be obligated to complete the purchase of said property or to further complete the said contract.”

If this finding was justified, then the contract gave Wegner the option to either pay the $2,800 on March 1, 1939, and carry out…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Moss & Raley v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Simpson v. EardleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Warnekros v. BowmanArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Brown v. WisnerWashington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API