Legal Opinion · Dissent

Renninger v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1950No. 7567Published

1DissentKeeton, Justice

The questions presented for determination in this case are: Can an action of this, nature be maintained against a sovereign state, and do the constitution and laws of the State waive the immunity of the State from such suit?

It is a general proposition of law that a state by reason of its sovereignty is immune from suit, and it cannot be sued without its consent in its own courts, the courts of a sister state, or by an individual in the Federal Courts. 59 C.J. 300.

This principle was recognized by this court in Hollister v. State, 9 Idaho 8, 71 P. 541, 542, in which the court said:

“That a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Angelle v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API