Legal Opinion
Bloom v. Texas State Board of Pharmacy
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1965No. A-10431PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
The Respondent, The Texas State Board of Pharmacy, after notice and hearing on the 19th day of April, 1963, found Jerry Irving Bloom, a registered pharmacist, guilty1 of the charge of violating Article 4542a, Section 12(h), Vernon’s Annotated Statutes. Section 12(h) provides that the Pharmacy Board may in its discretion cancel, revoke or suspend the license of any pharmacist if the Pharmacy Board finds after hearing that a licensee has engaged in the act of “substitution” in the dispensing of drugs. The Act defines “substitution” as meaning “ * * * the dispensing of a drug or a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kordel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Whiteley v. Webb's CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Garner v. Texas State Board of PharmacyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aguirre v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- State v. HarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Bloom v. AH Robins CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- City of Galveston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Trimble v. Texas State Board of Registration for Professional EngineersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.