Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 15, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

On July 15, 1929, appellant deposited $3,436.16 with the State Bank of Orlando and Trust Com pany which amount remained in and was held by said bank at the time it was taken in hands by the Comptroller for liquidation August 5, 1929. Bill of complaint was filed in this cause July 31, 1931, praying that the said deposit be decreed to be a preferred claim and paid in full with interest thereon. A motion to dismiss the bill was overruled, answer was filed, testimony was taken and on final hearing, the relief prayed for was denied. This appeal is from that final decree.

The sole question raised by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brennan v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  2. Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Steele v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Dunlap v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Youmans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StillmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. Mallett v. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Mallett v. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Mickle v. Ormond Beach Bond, Mortgage & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr. v. SearsSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API