Mallett v. Tunnicliffe, as Liqdr.

Ellis, J.,

concurring. — I think Mrs. Mallett has a preferred claim for the full amount of her deposit $13,697.14. My views are expressed in dissenting opinion in the ease of Garrett vs. Tunnicliffe, Liquidator (107 Fla. 393, 145 So. 213), and I think she should be paid in full. My views expressed in the concurring opinion in the case of Everglade Cypress Co. vs. Tunnicliffe, Liquidator (107 Fla. 675, 148 So. 192), both opinions filed December — , 1932.