Legal Opinion
Desinor v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 14, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), entered April 11, 2005, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against her, dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
“[A] 11 litigants, regardless of the merits of their case, are entitled to a fair trial” (Habenicht v R. K. O. Theatres, 23 AD2d 378, 379 [1965]; see Salzano v City of New York, 22 AD2d 656 [1964]). “Inevitably a trial court sets the pattern for the jury” *522(Livant v Adams, 17 AD2d 784…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Habenicht v. R. K. O. Theatres, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Salzano v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Buckley v. 2570 Broadway Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Ougourlian v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Vazquez v. Costco Companies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rodriguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Nineteen Eighty-Nine, LLC v. IcahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017