Habenicht v. R. K. O. Theatres, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
It is unfortunate that we again are obliged to repeat what we have so often stated — that all litigants, regardless of the merits of their case, are entitled to a fair trial (Salzano v. City of New York, 22 A D 2d 656). A deprivation of a fair trial calls for a reversal of the decision or verdict rendered. The conduct of the Trial Judge in this case was such as to deny to the plaintiff the fair trial to which he was entitled. Accordingly, the judgment entered in defendant’s favor must be reversed and a new trial ordered.
From the very inception of the trial the court indicated its lack of…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Pallotta v. West Bend Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Rodriguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- DeCrescenzo v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Coque v. Wildflower Estates Developers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ougourlian v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.