Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply System
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentUtter, J.
(dissenting) — I dissent. The majority, by its narrow reading of municipal authority to provide electric power, places constraints on municipalities not intended by the Legislature. Municipal authority in this area must be read broadly to provide the flexibility which is absolutely crucial in furnishing such a capital-intensive service. The contractual arrangement in the present case is a form of purchase which, viewed at the time the contract was made, may well have been the most economically advantageous for all concerned. While the result has been tragic, the decision here today may not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Grimes County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Texas Municipal Power AgencyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Morin v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. P.U.D. Etc. v. WylieWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. City of SikestonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Washington Education Ass'n v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.