Legal Opinion
United States v. Draper
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 11, 1956No. Cr. A. No. 15063PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOUS, Chief Judge.
This matter arises upon the timely motion of defendant under Rule 41(b) F.R.Cr.P. 18 U.S.C.A. “for the return of seized property and the suppression of evidence.” The defendant has been indicted for receiving and facilitating the transportation of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. By his motion he alleges in effect that certain law enforcement officers committed an illegal and unreasonable search of his person and possessions, and thereafter seized from him a quantity of heroin and a syringe. His motion seeks to suppress evidence of the heroin and a return to him of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. James Dock MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Freddie L. Perry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- James Alonzo Draper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.