Legal Opinion

BAHTA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2000No. ID 3437PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3437 In re Awat Mengisteab BAHTA, Respondent File A25 305 035 - Eloy Decided October 4, 2000 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The respondent’s conviction for attempted possession of stolen property, in violation of sections 193.330 and 205.275 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, is a conviction for an attempt- ed “theft offense (including receipt of stolen property),” and therefore an aggravated felony, within the meaning of sections 101(a)(43)(G) and (U) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,

8 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sejid Smriko v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Sokha Sun v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert Coleman, District Director of InsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. AVETISYANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
  4. United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. SMRIKOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API