Legal Opinion

State, Department of Human Rights v. Hibbing Taconite Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 17, 1992No. C3-91-1798, C1-91-1816Published

1Opinion of the Court

482 N.W.2d 504 (1992)

STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Respondent (C3-91-1798), Relator (C1-91-1816),

v.

HIBBING TACONITE COMPANY, Relator (C3-91-1798), Respondent (C1-91-1816).

Nos. C3-91-1798, C1-91-1816.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 17, 1992.

Review Denied May 15, 1992.

Raymond L. Erickson, Richard J. Leighton, Hanft, Fride, O'Brien, Harries, Swelbar & Burns, P.A., Duluth, for Hibbing Taconite Co., relator (C3-91-1798), respondent (C1-91-1816).

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Richard L. Varco, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for State of Minn., Dept. of Human Rights,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Lundgren v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Varice Smith, Jr. v. Olin Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API