Legal Opinion

Shelton Building Corp. v. Baggett

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 10, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Memorandum

It was error to dismiss the landlord’s petition for failure to serve a thirty days’ notice to terminate the tenancy. Such notice was not required under the terms of the lease which expired on May 31, 1945, or under the Bent Regulation for Housing. The tenant, by continuing in possession after that date, became a statutory tenant (Stern v. Equitable Trust Co., 238 N. Y. 267; Tomphins v. Kornfeld, 186 Misc. 464; Boyce Haulage Corp v. Bronx Terminal Garage, 185 Misc. 892). Under such a tenancy the terms and conditions of the lease are deemed to continue in effect except where they are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stern v. . Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. 130 West 57 Corp. v. HymanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946
  3. Royce Haulage Corp. v. Bronx Terminal Garage, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
  4. Tompkins v. KornfeldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Whitmarsh v. FarnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Lewittes & Sons v. SpielmannAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947
  3. Glauberman v. University Plage Apartments, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Graf v. MillerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  5. Broadway-Sheridan Arms, Inc. v. PhillipsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API