Legal Opinion
Lewittes & Sons v. Spielmann
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided August 11, 1947PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
That monthly tenants are entitled to thirty days’ notice required by section 232-a of the Beal Property Law is not questioned. Cases supporting that view are good law but not applicable here. The sole question here involved is whether the tenants-appellants are tenants at will or by sufferance as they claim, or monthly tenants as now suggested, and therefore entitled to thirty days’ notice under either section 228 of section 232-a of the Beal Property Law.
The State emergency Commercial Bent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, § 8, subds. [c], [d], as amd. by L. 1945, ch. 315, § 8, subds. [c], [d], as amd.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Stern v. . Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Martin v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Haynes v. . AldrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Park Summit Realty Corp. v. FrankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
- Whitmarsh v. FarnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Colonna & Co. v. Anthony M. Meyerstein, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Empire State, Inc. v. Graceline Handbags, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1948
- Graf v. MillerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.