Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Blaisdell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1860PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Dearborn Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Blaisdell sued the school trustees of Yor!~ towns~iip for refusing admission to his children into a district school, in said township.

*74Blaisd&ll was a resident of the adjoining township of Kelso / but he avers that the trustees of Kelso, on, &c., “duly transferred- him, for educational purposes, to said township of York;” and that on, &c., at, &c., “the clerk of said township of Kelso duly served a certified copy of said transfer on the trustees and clerk of the township of York?

The complaint consisted, when filed, of three paragraphs. A motion was made, that the plaintiff strike out two of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thurston v. PrentissMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Whitney v. HitchcockNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Moncrief v. ElyNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  4. Lang v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  5. Gedney v. Inhabitants of TewksburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Schoonover v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Forte v. Connerwood Healthcare, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Smith v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Runnels v. KaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API