Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Eagle Admixtures Ltd. v. Hannon

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1993No. 92CA0892Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge NEY

specially concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I agree with the majority that the judgment entered cannot stand. However, I write separately because I believe that the proper reasons for reversal should be other than those upon which the majority bases its result.

Further, I would remand for an entry of judgment for plaintiff rather than for a new trial.

I

I do not agree that the subordination clause of tenant’s lease automatically extinguished all of tenant’s rights when Silverado foreclosed the property in 1987. Rather, I believe that the terms of the lease terminate the tenant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rine v. IshamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. White v. ShortColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Furnary v. MerrittColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API