Legal Opinion

Hardcastle v. Davis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 9, 1959No. 5-1767Published

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a suit by the appellants, Ed Hardcastle and Mike Akel, to require the appellee, Amanda Beatrice Davis, to remove fences that she has erected in what are asserted to he public alleys in Block 22, Choctaw Addition to North Little Bock. The city intervened in behalf of the plaintiffs. The chancellor found that the long-continued use of the alleys has been merely permissive and accordingly dismissed the complaint and intervention for want of equity.

Block 22 is bounded on the west by Buckeye Street and on the north by East Broadway. Mrs. Davis’s residential lot fronts on Buckeye Street, at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boullioun v. ConstantineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. McGill v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Lecroy v. SigmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  4. Kirby v. City of HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. LangfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API