Legal Opinion

Murray v. Geithner

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 14, 2011No. Civil 08-15147PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [dkt. 57], Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [dkt. 66/67], 1 and Plaintiffs mo tion to strike [dkt. 79]. The parties have fully briefed the motions. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers such that the decision process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(f)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motions be resolved on the briefs…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adirath Vikram Gundu and Isha Diddy v. Srinath Kalmadi and Arti UpadhyayaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  2. Bell v. SouthfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  3. Brandi Boulware v. Trans Union LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  4. Busch Marine, Incorporated v. Great American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  5. Catchings v. Hazel Park School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API