Legal Opinion
Spodek v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 6, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company is obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in an action brought against them by defendants Nevin Cohen and Kenneth Skudrna entitled Cohen v Spodek (index Number 3456/87), in the Civil Court, Kings County, the defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated September 27, 1988, which granted that relief.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the paragraph thereof which directed the defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Servidone Construction Corp. v. Security InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Key Bank v. GrossiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- American Automobile Insurance v. Security Income Planners & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Sea Crest Construction Corp. v. Centennial InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Simply Lite Food Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Cocchi v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989