Legal Opinion
Julio Villavicencio v. Jefferson Sessions
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 2018No. 13-74324PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Julio . Cesar Villavicencio seeks review of a decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming findings of removability and of ineligibility for cancellation of removal, made by an Immigration Judge (IJ). Villavicencio was removed pursuant to the provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)©. 1 Villaviéencio maintains that the state crimes underlying his removal, Nevada Revised Statutes (N.R.S.) §§ 199.480 2 and 454.351 3 are not a categorical match to the federal generic statutes because they are overbroad and indivisible. We agree with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Mellouli v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Carlos Rendon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Villavicencio v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- J. Kathleen Huge v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jianming Wang v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Julio Villavicencio v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018