Legal Opinion

J. Kathleen Huge v. Boeing Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2018No. 16-35250Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 27 2018 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT J. KATHLEEN HUGE, No. 16-35250 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00857-RSM v. MEMORANDUM* THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 12, 2018 Seattle, Washington Before: D.W. NELSON and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON,** District Judge. J. Kathleen Huge (“Huge”) appeals the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Scrivener v. Clark CollegeWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Jane Doe v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Cecelia Yin v. State of California Daryll Tsujihara Linda Nicholson Robert Catale and Tony SunseriCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Tracy Dunlap v. Liberty Natural ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API