Legal Opinion

Fisher v. City of Grand Island

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1992No. 89-682Published

1Opinion of the Court

479 N.W.2d 772 (1992)

239 Neb. 929

Clarence E. FISHER, Appellee,

v.

CITY OF GRAND ISLAND, Nebraska, Appellant.

No. 89-682.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

February 7, 1992.

Keith Sinor, Grand Island City Atty., for appellant.

Daniel M. Placzek, of Luebs, Dowding, Beltzer, Leininger, Smith & Busick, Grand Island, for appellee.

HASTINGS, C.J., and BOSLAUGH, WHITE, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, GRANT, and FAHRNBRUCH, JJ.

BOSLAUGH, Justice.

The City of Grand Island (City) has appealed from the judgment of the district court finding that the claimant, Clarence E. Fisher, was entitled to receive pension benefits under…

Also in this document: Dissent · White; Dissent · Shanahan.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. League v. VaniceNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Holden v. UrbanNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Paxton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Lindgren v. SCHOOL DIST. OF BRIDGEPORT IN MORRILL CTY.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API