Legal Opinion

State v. White

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 23, 1991No. 23477PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

After his attorney was relieved, appellant was convicted in his absence without counsel of trafficking in cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. The following day he appeared pro se before the trial judge for the opening of his sealed sentence. The record fails to show that the trial judge made any finding that appellant made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel at trial. Appellant, therefore, contends that he is entitled to a new trial. We disagree.

The State argues that this issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. In State v. Williams, —…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. CashSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. CainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. PrideCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. DialSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API