Legal Opinion

State v. Pride

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 20, 2007No. 4208PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, J.:

Christopher Lee Pride was tried in absentia and without counsel for the charges of possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute and possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute within the proximity of a school. After the jury convicted Pride of both offenses, the circuit court judge issued a sealed sentence. Pride appeals, arguing the circuit court judge erred in finding he waived his right to counsel. We affirm.1

FACTS

As a result of an on-going narcotics investigation, detectives with the Union Police Department identified Pride as a crack cocaine dealer. On the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. CainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FaireyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API