Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 13, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

893 A.2d 60 (2006)

383 N.J. Super. 663

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Jose RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted February 7, 2006.

Decided March 13, 2006.

Fusco & Macaluso, Livingston, for appellant (Anthony J. Fusco, Jr., on the brief).

Zulima V. Farber, Attorney General, for respondent (Adrienne B. Reim, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges KESTIN, LEFELT and HOENS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HOENS, J.A.D.

Defendant Jose Rodriguez appeals from the June 14, 2002 order of the Law Division…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCann v. Clerk of City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. Moore v. Youth Correctional InstituteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. State v. GismondiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  4. State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HupkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. State v. HupkaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. State v. HupkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. State v. HupkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API