Legal Opinion

State v. Hupka

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 3, 2010No. A-36 September Term 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

1 A.3d 640 (2010)

203 N.J. 222

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Jeremiah HUPKA, Defendant-Respondent.

A-36 September Term 2009

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 8, 2010.

Decided August 3, 2010.

Bennett A. Barlyn, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (J. Patrick Barnes, Hunterdon County Prosecutor, attorney).

Darren M. Gelber argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Gelber and Ellen Torregrossa-O'Connor, Woodbridge, on the brief).

Carol M. Henderson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · LaVECCHIA; Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API