Legal Opinion

Mikkelson v. Faber

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

The record discloses that there is ample testimony to support the above findings. It is, however, argued by defendant’s counsel that the plaintiffs cannot recover a commission, for the reason that the only price expressed in the agreement is the sum of $7,200, and that *66with the exception of such price the amount for which the property may be sold is not definitely fixed, as required by sec. 240.10 of the Statutes.

It may be conceded that unless the property is sold for $7,200 the agreement does not fix definitely in dollars the amount of the sale price; but it does provide a basis upon which a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gifford v. StraubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Mackenzie v. StaudenmayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Roberts v. GoodladWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Buroff v. BergmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Winston v. MinkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Buckman v. E. H. Schaefer & Associates, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API